I work behind the scenes as your accessibility partner: audits, remediation and sign-off you can white-label into client projects, on your timeline.
Reports and fixes delivered under your brand. I stay invisible unless you want me in the room.
Scoped to your delivery dates, with paste-ready fixes your devs ship without a detour.
Conformance statements mapped to the EAA, WCAG 2.2 AA and EN 301 549 you can hand to clients.
Every engagement includes a written non-solicit. I don't pitch, poach, or take your client on outside our work together — the account is yours, I'm the specialist behind it. Approach a client you brought me and the agreement voids.
My site's own accessibility statement is public — open issues and all. Proof that I hold myself to the standard I'll hold your client's site to. Most vendors won't show you theirs.
See my accessibility statement →Overlays mask problems, raise legal exposure, and degrade the experience for the users they claim to help. I fix the actual site — so your client is defensible, not exposed.
Every issue in the report reads like this — the exact standard it fails, a paste-ready fix your devs ship in a minute, and a plain-language note for the client. The example below is illustrative; real reports are redacted per client.
WCAG 2.2 AA · 1.4.3 Contrast (Minimum) · EN 301 549 § 9.1.4.3
The CTA label is #7A7A7A on #FFFFFF — a 4.0:1 ratio, under the 4.5:1 minimum for text.
.btn { color: #595959; } /* 7.0:1 on #fff — passes AA and AAA */In plain English: low-vision visitors can't read your main call-to-action. It's a one-line CSS change.
Yes. Reports, fixes, and the conformance statement ship under your brand. I only join a call or email if you want me in the room — as far as your client knows, accessibility is something your studio does.
No — every engagement includes a written non-solicit. I don't pitch, poach, or take your client on outside our work together. The relationship stays yours; that's the point of a partner.
Documented findings — each with a screenshot, a WCAG 2.2 AA / EN 301 549 citation, and paste-ready code or copy — plus an honest conformance statement mapped to the EAA. Scoped to your delivery dates, not a 200-page PDF nobody reads.
A fixed quote within 24–48 hours of seeing the site. Most single-site audits land in about two weeks; a small site can be days. Your deadline is what I plan around.
One fixed price by scope — page count and user flows — in writing before we start. You set the margin you charge your client. No day-rates, no per-seat licensing, no surprises.
Yes — I'm based in the Netherlands and work across the EAA, EN 301 549, and the national layer (the Dutch implementing act, the ACM as regulator). I'll also flag when your client's municipality subsidises accessibility work — it can cover a large share of the cost.