Navigation & interaction
Keyboard traps, broken focus order, error messages screen readers don't hear, time-outs that strand users mid-task.
EAA conformance, without slowing delivery
I help EU small and mid-sized businesses meet the European Accessibility Act and the technical standards behind it (WCAG 2.2 AA and EN 301 549) — and I run Sluip, built to WCAG 2.2 AA and adopting AAA principles, in production. When I tell you what works, it's because I've shipped it.
The accessibility problems that block people from completing tasks — not the warnings an automated scanner can flag in two minutes.
Keyboard traps, broken focus order, error messages screen readers don't hear, time-outs that strand users mid-task.
Heading hierarchies that break screen-reader navigation. Link text that makes no sense out of context. Forms without labels.
Meaningful alt text, captions, transcripts. Audio descriptions where they matter.
PDFs with proper tags, reading order, bookmarks, and alt text. Or honest conversion to HTML where a PDF was the wrong format in the first place.
Touch targets that work for tremor. Menus that don't trap focus. Skip links that survive responsive breakpoints.
Reports your developers can act on, not 200-page PDFs that sit in a drawer.
Track every finding, priority, and fix status in one place.
Every issue gets a screenshot, a WCAG/EAA citation, paste-ready code or copy, and a plain-language explanation.
Questions for 2 weeks after every audit. Verification pass once your team ships fixes.
How I evaluate
WCAG-EM
Every audit follows WCAG-EM — the W3C's official methodology for evaluating a website against the accessibility rules. It isn't another standard; it's the procedure that makes your result trustworthy. A defined scope, a representative sample of pages chosen for a documented reason, and a clear pass or fail for every requirement — so what you get is something you can put in front of a regulator, a customer, or your own lawyer with confidence.
What that looks like, step by step
Without a fixed sampling method, “I audited your site” can mean one page or forty. WCAG-EM is why my findings hold up if a regulator, a client's lawyer, or a second auditor comes back to check them.
Fixed price scoped to your project — set by your number of key pages and user flows — in writing before you sign. Every tier ends in a published, honest accessibility statement. Regulated or larger? See Custom / Portfolio; prefer hourly billing? See [hourly rates](/work-with-me/hourly-work).
A focused manual audit for the smallest sites — up to ~5 key page templates and one primary flow, ending in an honest accessibility statement scoped to exactly what was checked.
A full manual audit for a single site with a few real flows — the tier most small webshops and SMEs in scope will need, with follow-up support after delivery.
Deeper coverage for a larger site — multiple flows, EN/NL language parity, document spot-checks, and a stakeholder-ready conformance summary for the regulator file.
For regulated sectors, multi-product suites, design systems, and expert testimony. Scoped per engagement, with a fixed quote after a call.
What's included
Every engagement ends in a published, honest accessibility statement — the claim scoped to the evidence. Included at every tier, never withheld.
Dutch MKB grant A grant can cover up to 75% of accessibility costs (max €15,000) for MKB in municipalities like Nijmegen and Arnhem — enough to turn a Small-business audit into a few-hundred-euro net decision. Ask how to apply →
Templates and checklists to start fixing things yourself: an audit checklist, a fix-tracker, and a ready-to-edit accessibility statement.
Once your team has made the fixes, I re-check the site and confirm what now passes.
I make the fixes myself and hand back ready-to-use code, so your team doesn't have to decode the report.
A focused hour on one problem — bring a page or a question and get clear, concrete answers.
Ongoing monitoring and a monthly check-up, so new issues get caught as your site changes.
Hands-on ongoing support for larger sites with several key user journeys to keep compliant.
Price is set by the number of key pages and user flows; regulated sectors (finance, transport, healthcare) and complex apps are scoped individually.
All prices ex. VAT. EU B2B clients invoice under reverse-charge (BTW-id required).
Ad-hoc consultation available at €125/hour for single questions or existing clients. 2-hour minimum session. Not a substitute for a scoped engagement.
Transparent, short, and structured. No mystery, no chasing email threads.
Send your project details — or book a 15-minute EAA check. I review your situation and reply within 24 hours.
Within 24–48 hours, I send a detailed proposal with scope, timeline, and fixed price. No vague day-rate estimates.
Once approved, I set up your client portal, share the testing plan, and book the kickoff call. Work usually starts within 5 business days.
Findings land in your dashboard as I work. Daily progress updates. Final walkthrough on completion. Support period starts after delivery.
Two engagements, written up in full — the audit day by day, and how document remediation works. No mystery before you sign.
Book a 15-minute EAA check. I'll walk through your situation, tell you what to prioritize, and quote the work — or tell you honestly if you don't need me.
15 minutes, no pitch — I’ll tell you honestly if you don’t need me. I build Sluip to WCAG 2.2 AA, adopting AAA principles, and publish my own audit, open issues and all.